Saturday, 13 May 2017

First Quarter " Open Flow (SDN) Technology for Managing Content Centric Networks "

The objective of this article is for our audience who are interested in the Content-Centric Networking (CCN) as the future internet architecture and services and that is why we put together this article from April's workshop proceedings at  12.00Hrs G.M.T


This article focuses on the use of Open Flow (SDN) Technology for Managing Content Centric Networks in the future internet and efficient service delivery. Managing the future internet will be based on policies that support named content. Much credit goes to Van Jacobson in his original idea from the 2009 seminar on named content and his recent project work on Named Data Networking Next Phase (NDN-NP)

In next generation networks, packet move through an open flow network. Open flow is a standardized protocol for interacting with the forwarding behavior of the switches from multiple vendors.          This provides a way to dynamically and programmatically control the behavior of switches throughout the network. Open Flow is a pertinent protocol in SDN solutions. The open network foundation (ONF) defines an open flow switch contains one or more tables.  Each is meant to hold flow entries.
Credit also goes to John Cosmas recent brilliant work that focused on multi-faceted evaluation of the control architecture and application in diverse environments  which gave us insight in this workshop.
Their contributions reveal that data synchronization is a significant NDN Communication primeval for distributed applications. Named data is a better abstraction for today’s communication than named hosts and presented Content-Centric Networking (CCN) as the future internet architecture.
Further demonstration of NDN capabilities in Internet of Things (IoT) and big data environments are work in progress.
 Our May 2017 workshop focuses on the evaluation of communication cost of multi-casting sync interests and designing more scalable and efficient solutions for delivering sync interest.
The Content Centric Networks model is developed around named content and not data location.     The pro of our technical report is that Content Centric Network can be utilized as Overlay Networks. 
The security of named content is guaranteed unlike IP networking where the host-based vulnerabilities are still germane issue.
Our Discussions on the limited understanding of the performance in realistic operational conditions of Content routers cache from a theoretical perspective to practical demonstrations are available on our website.
The big picture question is how do content providers and service providers handle the major research problem of scalability in content-centric networks? Various ICN projects introduced Content Centric Networking Routing with the main aim to anchor matching prefixes. This viable proposition is similar to the outcome of our technical report.  However, it eliminates the use of a pending Interest Tables (PIT) or forwarding information bases lookup before forwarding interests.  The next article will explore how CCN as a communications protocol can complement existing IP infrastructure and critically evaluate and discuss solution to forwarding interests criterion. 



NGIT systems has a global footprint. We are aware that some of our audience may not have the chance to visit us both in conferences and workshops, If your have specific questions about NGIT  Packet Flow Services and about our products, feel free to stop at our online chat room with one of our representatives and drop us a mail at corporatesales@ngittech.com.ng to tell you more about the company. right now,

0 comments:

Post a Comment